The Long War University, Part I. (Updated, November 30, 2011)
By Allen Ruff & Steve Horn*
Currently serving the national security warfare state, a matrix of closely tied university-based strategic studies ventures, the so-called Grand Strategy Programs, have cropped up on a number of elite campuses around the country. In tandem with allied institutes and think tanks, these programs centered at Yale University, Duke University, the University of Texas at Austin, Columbia University, Temple University and, until recently, the University of Wisconsin-Madison, illustrate the increasingly influential role of a new breed of warrior academics in the post-September 11 United States.
Ostensibly created to train an
up-and-coming elite to see a global “big picture,” this grand strategy network
has brought together numbers of “liberal hawk” and conservative foreign policy
wonks heavily invested, literally and figuratively, in an unending quest to
maintain US global
supremacy, a campaign which they increasingly refer to as the Long War.[1] The network marks the ascent and influence of the Long War University.
The various GSPs are headed by an array of hawkish foreign policy mavens, among them well-funded younger faculty with thinking molded by the Post-September 11 “war on terror” environment. The programs have also been peopled by an assortment of government ex-officials, former and ongoing advisers at the White House, National Security Council, and the CIA. They connect through a host of campus-based think tank institutes and consortia, personal and professional connections, school ties, and funding from a circle of conservative foundations and individual “philanthropists”.
The various GSPs are headed by an array of hawkish foreign policy mavens, among them well-funded younger faculty with thinking molded by the Post-September 11 “war on terror” environment. The programs have also been peopled by an assortment of government ex-officials, former and ongoing advisers at the White House, National Security Council, and the CIA. They connect through a host of campus-based think tank institutes and consortia, personal and professional connections, school ties, and funding from a circle of conservative foundations and individual “philanthropists”.
Also participating are cashiered military officers, now residing as "warrior intellectuals" in the academy. The network is closely tethered to the Pentagon’s War Colleges, most notably the US Naval War College at Newport, Rhode Island and such warfare planning centers such as the US Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) centered at Fort Monroe, Virginia.[2]
The Long War Men at Yale
Grand Strategist John Gaddis |
Diplomat-in-Exile Charlie Hill |
According to Gaddis, the original ideas shaping the program’s curriculum were drawn from the efforts of an earlier generation of strategic planners and stemmed from his experience as a mid-1970s faculty member at the Naval War College.[8]
Paul Kennedy thinking globally |
A tight-lipped John Negroponte |
John Gaddis celebrated Negroponte’s return to his alma mater. “Look at the number of jobs he’s held, it’s quite remarkable,” the diplomatic historian told the Yale Daily News. “One of the things we’ve been trying to do in the Grand Strategy program is to bring more practitioners to campus, and we’re very fortunate to have landed him.”[10]
He also was director of the Pentagon-contracted MITRE Corporation, the manager of the DOD’s research and development centers and such programs as the JASONs, the consortium of campus-based researchers, founded in 1960 and still involved in classified and unclassified work for the DOD, the intelligence community and space programs.[12] (The University of Wisconsin JASONs, named after, but not verifiably connected to the national organization, was instrumental in the creation of Grand Strategy Program at Madison.)
Charles Johnson (l.) & Nick Brady (r) gave Yale's GSP $17.5 million and Yale Pres. Richard Levin (c.) gave them trophies, 2006. |
While the identities of those associated with the Yale program certainly speak volumes, the actual program they devised is far more revealing, especially since it provided the prototype for efforts elsewhere.
The year-long program came to include the study of “classics” in strategic thinking from Sun Tzu and Thucydides to Clausewitz and Kissinger, first developed at the Naval War College as the "Thucydides curriculum"[14] and a focus on “real world practice.” Aspiring entrants in the program are required to write essays of application and the cross-discipline pool of graduate students and undergraduates is carefully vetted.
In addition to their formal studies, the "GSers," as they self-describe, are required to complete summer projects that have included internships at the European Union’s Institute for Security Studies and the National Security Agency as well as travel abroad. Students completing the program have gone on to jobs with the Secretary of State, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Defense Department’s subcontracted Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA).[15]
The year-long GSP course, from its inception, has concluded with a “crisis simulation” session in which teams of students prepare power-pointed “emergency rapid response” scenarios as if preparing for a “real time” meeting of the National Security Council and the President. Role playing the President and other administration officials, program faculty then grill the presenters and critique their work.[16]
Petraeus with Gaddis (l.) visits Yale's GSP, March, 2010 |
Kissinger (r.) with Charlie Hill (l.) and Paul Kennedy (c.) at recent Yale GSP seminar |
In addition to re-establishing ties with the Corps, severed and frayed since Vietnam, the representatives of the “Combat Development Command and the Corp Commandant’s Strategic Initiatives Group” briefed the GS students, faculty and other invited guests on the Corp’s “Vision and Strategy2025,” a planning document describing “how the Marine Corps’ role and posture in national defense will change in the future global environment.”[20]
Gaddis could tell the Yale Alumni Magazine in 2003 that, “…We now offer workshops in grand strategy at the war colleges and service academies, recreating a connection with the highest levels of the military… And Washington has taken notice.”
Columbia's Connelly |
Jeremi Suri, now at Texas |
Jeb Nadaner, Yalie on the move |
A strategic planning specialist, Nadaner then went on to become Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense. Switching to the private sector in 2008, he became “Director of Strategy,” at the nation’s top defense contractor, Lockheed Martin, where he now sits as “Director of National Security Innovation”.
He Who Pays the Piper…
Strategic Philanthropist, Roger Hertog. |
In 2001, in conjunction with other conservatives, including the Canadian media mogul, Conrad Black, [23] he bankrolled the New York Sun, that city’s short-lived rightward counter to the New York Times.[24] He was formerly a part-owner of The New Republic and a board member of the neo-conservative Commentary magazine.
Funneled through Shalem, his funds have subsidized campus-based student journals inaugurated, in part, to counteract criticism of Israel at various universities.[26] Hertog has also been a important contributor, along numbers of other multi-millionaire conservatives, to the Birthright Israel Foundation, which by October, 2010 had sent more than 260,000 young Jewish-Americans on all-expense paid 10-day trips to Israel.
Roger Hertog receives National Humanities Medal, 2007 |
Gov.Walker & He Who Pays the Piper |
In the business of shaping intellectual environments, Hertog has been described as the “the epitome of the conservative benefactor who bases his politics on conservative intellectualism and moves patiently and strategically to create, support and distribute his ideas.” Norm Podhoretz, the former editor of Commentary, said of his longtime friend that, “Roger thinks of philanthropic endeavors as investments. The return he expects is long range.”[28]
Importantly, Hertog has been staunch advocate of a conservative results-based “new philanthropy” -- the replacement of open-ended funding for endowed university chairs with money for selected projects, made available on a two or three year basis. He makes little distinction between the nonprofit and for-profit ventures that he funds and has spoken of "retail” and “strategic philanthropy,” as “leverage” to transform the American academy.
As of 2008, among other ventures, Hertog had funded the Alexander Hamilton Center for Political Economy at New York University to the tune of over $2 million and given $5.2 million to the NYU law school, funneled $4.5 million to Princeton, and $1.5 million to Yeshiva University, all through the Tikvah Fund, the massively-endowed foundation he heads. [29]
Grand
Strategy Goes National
In September, 2008, some 20 younger
historians and political scientists from around the country gathered in New
Haven at an unpublicized location nearby Yale. The
participants, carefully chosen by the university’s GSP directors, had been
invited to meet with Hertog.[30] The financial management mogul told those at the Yale meet-up that he was willing to spend as much as $10 million over the coming years to fund scholars interested in inaugurating grand strategy programs at their respective campuses. He requested short, three-page proposals from the professors-on-the-rise detailing how they would use his seed money.
He urged them to think about how to connect their projects with others around the country to leverage their collective impact, and cautioned that he did not necessarily want exact replicas of Yale's venture. The subsequent GSPs and allied programs, some of them already up and running, evolved with his assistance.[31]
Roger Hertog & Jeremi Suri, then head of Wisconsin's GSP |
Hertog has also funded Long War research fellows at the Council on Foreign Relations, among them Stephen Biddle, the former associate professor and chair of military studies at the U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute; and Michael J. Gerson, George W. Bush's chief speechwriter from 2001 until June 2006, and senior policy advisor from 2000 through June 2006. (Gerson has been attributed with coining the phrase “axis of evil,” the phrase referring to Iraq, Iran, and North Korea that made its first appearance in Bush’s 2002 State of the Union address.) [35]
Long
War in the Triangle
Duke's Peter Feaver |
A political scientist with a Harvard PhD, Feaver also is the director of Triangle Institute for Security Studies (TISS), the well-established strategic policy consortium with affiliates at Duke, the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, and North Carolina State.[37]
A specialist in the relationship between civil society and the military, Feaver served under the Clinton administration, from 1993 to 1994, as director for defense policy and arms control on the National Security Council; as an expert on national security strategy, counter-proliferation policy, regional nuclear arms control, and other political-military issues. Bipartisan, he then worked as special advisor for strategic planning and institutional reform on the NSC staff during the Bush years, from June 2005 to July 2007.[38]
John Nagl, co-author Counterinsurgency Field Manual FM-324 |
Nagl helped write the influential Army/Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Field Manual under the command of former General David Petraeus. Now in the civilian garb of the warrior intellectual, he exerts significant influence among the Long War academics. Nagl currently moderates Foreign Policy magazine’s “Shadow Government” blog along with fellow Long Warrior, Jeremi Suri's associate at the U-Texas-Austin Strauss Center, Yale alum William Inboden.
DoD Head Robert Gates at Duke |
Grand Strategist H.R. McMaster |
An ultimate warrior intellectual, McMaster holds a PhD in US History from the University of North Carolina, has been a research fellow at the Hoover Institute and London’s International Institute for Strategic Studies, lectured at the American Enterprise Institute, and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Michael Doran, Middle East Semi-Warrior |
The Warriors at Temple
A “Hertog Seminar In Grand Strategy” was launched at Temple
University in spring 2009, with the assistance of a 3-year, $225,000 grant from
the Hertog Foundation arranged through the foreign policy historians, Yale alum
Will Hitchcock and Richard Immerman, current director of the university’s
Center for the Study of Force and Diplomacy (emphasis theirs). The CENFAD newsletter stated at the time that Temple had been chosen “as a site for replicating Yale University’s ‘Grand Strategy’ course – a yearlong seminar on military strategy (emphasis ours) taught by Charles Hill, John Lewis Gaddis, and Paul Kennedy...”
The same article pointed out that Hertog did not believe in making unrestricted gifts to academe but rather believed in setting benchmarks to ensure the goals he envisioned. It went on to state ,“that CENFAD, its associates, and students will expend every effort to meet this challenge” to make sure that the Hertog Seminar in Grand Strategy remains at Temple.”[42]
Richard Immerman |
Housed at Temple’s History Department, CENFAD was founded in 1993, and “fosters interdisciplinary faculty and student research on the historic and contemporary use of force and diplomacy in a global context.” It currently is directed by Immerman, a liberal semi-warrior. Known for his historical writing on the Central Intelligence Agency, he served from 2007-2008, as “Assistant Deputy Director of National Intelligence, Analytic Integrity and Standards, and Analytic Ombudsman, Office of the Director of National Intelligence,” an oversight position created to ensure the standards and accuracy of national intelligence documents.
Around since 1955 as a conservative Cold War institute initially affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania and funded by the conservative Smith Richardson Foundation, FPRI has continued as an independent think tank “devoted to bringing the insights of scholarship to bear on the development of policies that advance U.S. national interests.”[43]
The institute reached the peak of its influence during the Reagan years and more currently focuses its attention on issues such as the “war on terrorism,” developments in the Middle East, relations with China, Russia, and Japan, and broader questions including the roles of religion and ethnicity in international politics, and “the nature of Western identity and its implications for the U.S. and the Atlantic Alliance.”[44]
Long War Summers at Columbian
Ad for Columbia's HGSI, 2010 |
The first year’s session focused on “Nuclear Proliferation and the Future of World Power” and was co-taught by Connelly and Francis“Frank” Gavin, visiting from the Strauss Center at U-Texas-Austin. The summer 2011 seminar focused on “The History and Future of Pandemic Threats and Global Public Health.” The projected session for the summer, 2012 will focus on “Religious Violence and Apocalyptic Movements”.
The program clearly resembles that developed by Gaddis at Yale. Students spend the first three weeks of the summer in “total immersion” training the methods of international history. Eight weeks are then spent conducting independent and team projects, followed by a final week where the students present their research, develop future scenarios, and participate in crisis simulation exercises.[46]
Kissinger at HGSI seminar. (Connelly to his right; Gavin to his left) |
For their final week scenario building “simulation”
exercise, seminar students were led by Dr. Betty Sue Flowers, a leading expert
in “future forecasting” and the guiding force behind Shell Oil’s Global
Scenarios, a much emulated standard for corporate and government scenario
projects including the National Intelligence Council’s “Global Trends Reports”.
[48]
Long Horn Long Warriors
In May 2010, Jeremi Suri, the force behind the organization
and director of the ill-fated Grand Strategy Program at the University of
Wisconsin-Madison announced that he was taking a joint appointment at the
University of Texas, including a position at the increasingly prestigious Robert
S. Strauss Center for International Security and Law. A brief survey of the Strauss
Center suggests that Suri’s move to
Austin was nothing, if not the
perfect decision for Madison’s
former wunderkind and “rising star.” The
Strauss Center
was already rife with star power. Yale Grand Strategy alum at Texas, Will Inboden, |
He previously was a senior director for strategic planning on the National Security Council at the White House, where he worked on a range of issues including the national security strategy, “democracy and governance,” contingency planning, and “counter-radicalization”.
Prior to the NSC, Inboden was a member of the Policy Planning Staff at the State Department and a special adviser in the Office of International Religious Freedom.[49]
The Center has had an additional number of Long War intellectuals with top-level national security state ties among its associates. They include Phillip Bobbitt, concurrently the “Roger Hertog Program on Law and National Security” at the Columbia University Law School and a senior fellow at Strauss.
Bobby Ray Inman |
Phillip Bobbitt talk on "Wars for 21st Century," London, 2008 |
He also was senior director for Critical Infrastructure, and senior director for Strategic Planning under Bill Clinton. He’s been a member of the Task Force on National Security and Law at the Hoover Institution. Having served as an adviser to four Presidents, he has been described as "the Presidents' brain."[51]
Fluent grand strategist Celeste Gventer |
Leaving her position as Senior Defense Analyst at the Rand Corporation, defense
policy wonk Celeste Gventer became the associate director of the Strauss
Center in October, 2010. She
previously served two tours in Iraq
– in 2003-04, when she worked on the creation of the Iraqi Ministry
of Defense and as an assistant to the Iraqi National Security Advisor; and in
2006 as politico-military adviser to Gen Peter W. Chiarelli, currently the
second-highest ranking officer in the US Army.
In 2006, the Strauss Center and Columbia University’s American Assembly Program launched the Next Generation Project on U.S. Global Policy, a multi-year national effort to solicit new ideas from a geographically diverse range of strategic thinkers outside the traditional East Coast corridors of power. With Frank Gavin at the helm, The Next Generation Project co-sponsored a March, 2010 conference at the Meridian International Center in Washington, DC. Attendees at the conclave jointly sponsored by the American Assembly, the Strauss Center, and the Center for New American Security (CNAS), examined the “U.S.Global Policy: Challenges to Building a 21st Century Grand Strategy".
Frank Gavin, Srauss Center Semi-Warrior |
Gavin was a 1997 Olin National Security Fellow at Harvard
University's Center for
International Affairs, subsequently an International Security Fellow at Harvard's Kennedy
School of Government, and a Research Fellow at the Miller Center for Public Affairs at the University
of Virginia. Gavin also spent the summer of 2010 at Columbia University's Hertog Global Strategy Initiative, alongside Mathew Connolly.
TISS…
TISS
Scattered at numerous campuses and institutes across the
country, the intellectuals of the Long War occasionally gather at various
conferences. The Feaver-lead Triangle Institute for Security Studies (TISS) hosted
one such confab in February, 2009, co-sponsored by Duke and the US Army War
College’s Strategic Studies Institute.The two-day conclave on “Grand Strategy After War” explored the “ways forward” beyond Iraq, for the US. Its sessions explored the aftermath of World War II, Korea, Vietnam, and the Cold War for "lessons learned" to help frame thinking in regard to “what a post-Iraq War domestic and strategic environment might look like.”
Academic Warrior "Mac" Owens |
Strategy.” Jeremi Suri, still the head of the Hertog-backed Grand Strategy Program at Wisconsin, presented a paper on “The Promise and Failure of American Grand Strategy after the Cold War.”
Commenting on his work was the Council on Foreign Relations “Hertog Fellow,” Stephen Biddle. That panel also included the conservative hawk MacKubin Owens, professor of Strategy and Force Planning at the Naval War College, a senior fellow at Temple’s Foreign Policy Research Institute and editor of its journal, Orbis, a significant platform for Long Warrior thinking.
A session appraising the US situation in the
post-Vietnam era heard a presentation by the warrior intellectual Mark Moyar, the “Kim T. Adamson Chair
of Insurgency and Terrorism at the U.S. Marine Corps University.” His Phoenix
and the Birds of Prey: Counterinsurgency and Counterterrorism in Vietnam (1997)
presented a positive assessment of the highly controversial CIA-run Phoenix
Program, the Vietnam-era counter insurgency program that assassinated tens of thousands
of South Vietnamese civilians.
Long Warrior Mark Moyar |
Commenting on Moyar’s presentation was Richard Betts, director of the International Security Policy Program at Columbia University, a former staff member on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the National Security Council and a consultant for Central Intelligence Agency.[52]
Long War University Homecoming
In August, 2010 key members of the Long
War grand strategist fraternity gathered for a “Workshop on the Teaching of
Grand Strategy” at the Naval War
College at Newport.[53] It
was only logical that they met there rather than at some university.The NWC, with its long history of strategic planning dating back to an earlier age of global naval power, had long before developed the curriculum that became the model for the “grand strategies discipline” employed at Yale and subsequently elsewhere.[54] For some attendees, like John Gaddis, who spent part of his early teaching career there, the summer return to Newport must have seemed like a homecoming. Intellectually, it was a return to base.
The gathering was designed to bring together “some of the nation’s most influential thinkers to explore how they design courses on grand strategy.” The meet-up’s list of attendees read like an abbreviated “who’s who” of right-of-center semi-warrior academics and revolving-door security intellectuals.
Charlie Hill speaks and Jeremi Suri (rear) listens, NWC, 2010 |
The current chair of military history at Ohio State, Peter Mansoor was on hand. A former Army colonel, he served as executive officer to General David Petraeus while the latter was commander of the US occupation forces in Iraq .
Peter Mansoor, Then... |
And now.. A warrior intellectual. |
Also attending was the hawkish Aaron Friedberg, national security advisor to Vice President Dick Cheney and a founding member of the Project for a New American Century, currently at Princeton's Center for International Security Studies.[59] Georgetown’s Robert J. Lieber, member of the ultra conservative Committee on the Present Danger, [60] also was there among the other imperial academics.[61]
The NWC retreat might best be described as an imperial war hawk’s “how-to” teach-in.
Geared to instruction on how to
teach grand strategy to military men, government officials and university
students, its sessions included one called “’Great Books’ on Strategy” (What
belongs in the canon [sic]…What students should read?)”; “Economics and Grand Strategy” (“How have
economies been targeted for attack? With what result?” “How has control of the
maritime commons [i.e. the open seas] contributed to strategic success?”). A
Session on “Terror War” explored “problems in teaching strategy of states
fighting non-state actors” and “how to study warfare amidst the peoples.”
Another workshop looking at “Strategic Leadership” explored “the relationship of political and military leadership in strategic decision making” and “leadership in democracies”. Yet another, on “Great Power Wars,” discussed how to teach “the strategic significance of the commons – maritime, aerospace, and information.” The closing session on “Second Thoughts and Away Ahead” looked at “how to stay connected with each other,” the “sharing of information about courses,” “ways to promote cooperation and break down barriers;” and “how to promote courses in the professional military and the universities.”[62]
A follow-up thank you note from the
NWC’s lead organizer spoke of his “hope that we will stay connected and assist
each other in our common enterprise.” The same note addressed to the workshop’s
participants contained the e-mail address “lewis@hudson.org,” belonging to
Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Senior Vice President of the neoconservative Hudson Institute. Vice President Dick Cheney's former
chief of staff, Libby was convicted in connection with the federal
investigation into the “PlameGate” affair.[63]
“Grand strategy” is little more than imperial doctrine, a “soft” public relations term for strategic studies -- a growing academic discipline with origins in the war ministries of an earlier era’s imperial powers. US warfare doctrine in the post-9/11 era has returned to a focus on counterinsurgency, or COIN; on fighting limited “asymmetric” wars against unconventional enemies defined as “terrorists” or insurgents. “Nation-building,” the “reconstruction” of other societies, cultures and “failed states” and the “winning of hearts and minds” at home as well as abroad -- are now included in COIN doctrine. Not just the conduct of “low intensity conflicts,” it has become a much broader, increasingly sophisticated spectrum of intervention, indeed a “growth industry” for a new generation of semi-warriors.
COIN has come to occupy a central place in the thinking of the warrior intellectuals busily informing one another and upcoming generations of their students. Sharing a broad consensus on America’s role in the world and imbued with a sense of American exceptionalism and enduring mission, these Long War intellectuals at the national warfare state universities have joined in preparation for a permanent war, one not solely for geo-strategic position or to assure a continued lion’s share of the world’s resources; but for imperial projects yet to come. Deeply invested in the future, the Long War University will continue. At least for the foreseeable future.
Another workshop looking at “Strategic Leadership” explored “the relationship of political and military leadership in strategic decision making” and “leadership in democracies”. Yet another, on “Great Power Wars,” discussed how to teach “the strategic significance of the commons – maritime, aerospace, and information.” The closing session on “Second Thoughts and Away Ahead” looked at “how to stay connected with each other,” the “sharing of information about courses,” “ways to promote cooperation and break down barriers;” and “how to promote courses in the professional military and the universities.”[62]
Hudson's Lewis "Scooter" Libby |
The Long War on
Campus
The so-called “Grand Strategy Programs” represent but one
small element of a proliferating Long
War University
complex. The number of university programs connected to the national security
state, the imperial foreign policy establishment and the military planners is
vast. So too, are the numbers of campus-based think tanks and related
institutes in service to empire, well-funded by foundations, wealthy
“philanthropists”, or directly by Federal spending.[64]“Grand strategy” is little more than imperial doctrine, a “soft” public relations term for strategic studies -- a growing academic discipline with origins in the war ministries of an earlier era’s imperial powers. US warfare doctrine in the post-9/11 era has returned to a focus on counterinsurgency, or COIN; on fighting limited “asymmetric” wars against unconventional enemies defined as “terrorists” or insurgents. “Nation-building,” the “reconstruction” of other societies, cultures and “failed states” and the “winning of hearts and minds” at home as well as abroad -- are now included in COIN doctrine. Not just the conduct of “low intensity conflicts,” it has become a much broader, increasingly sophisticated spectrum of intervention, indeed a “growth industry” for a new generation of semi-warriors.
COIN has come to occupy a central place in the thinking of the warrior intellectuals busily informing one another and upcoming generations of their students. Sharing a broad consensus on America’s role in the world and imbued with a sense of American exceptionalism and enduring mission, these Long War intellectuals at the national warfare state universities have joined in preparation for a permanent war, one not solely for geo-strategic position or to assure a continued lion’s share of the world’s resources; but for imperial projects yet to come. Deeply invested in the future, the Long War University will continue. At least for the foreseeable future.
******************
*Steve Horn is a Research Fellow at DeSmogBlog, as
well as a freelance investigative journalist. Allen Ruff is a U.S.
historian and independent writer on foreign policy issues. Both live in Madison,
WI.
Not to be quoted
or reproduced without the permission of the authors
[1] For example, Thomas Donnelly& Frederick W.
Kagan, eds., Lessons for a Long War - How America Can Win on New Battlefields (American Enterprise Institute, 2010) http://www.aei.org/book/100037
[2] [U.S. Naval War College], “Strategy and Policy Department Hosts Workshop
on the Teaching of Grand Strategy” (August, 2010) http://www.usnwc.edu/About/News-And-Events/August-2010/Strategy-and-Policy-Department-Hosts-Workshop-on-t.aspx; TRADOC: http://www.tradoc.army.mil/index.asp
Internal documents for the University of Wisconsin-Madison JASONs, acquired through Wisconsin Open Records requests, have revealed connections to the
Naval War College at Annapolis, the Air Force War College, and the National Defense University. (Photocopies in possession of authors)
[3] “Training the Next Leaders,” Yale Alumni Magazine, (March, 2003), http://www.yalealumnimagazine.com/issues/03_03/grandstrategy.html; Alexander Dworkowitz, “Masters of the Universe”, The New Journal, 10. (Nov, 2000) http://www.thenewjournalatyale.com/2000/11/masters-of-the-universe/ ; Amy Dockser Marcus, “Where Policy Makers Are Born,” Wall Street Journal, December 20, 2008, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122973925559323583.html#articleTabs%3Darticle.
[3] “Training the Next Leaders,” Yale Alumni Magazine, (March, 2003), http://www.yalealumnimagazine.com/issues/03_03/grandstrategy.html; Alexander Dworkowitz, “Masters of the Universe”, The New Journal, 10. (Nov, 2000) http://www.thenewjournalatyale.com/2000/11/masters-of-the-universe/ ; Amy Dockser Marcus, “Where Policy Makers Are Born,” Wall Street Journal, December 20, 2008, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122973925559323583.html#articleTabs%3Darticle.
[4] Gaddis
is the biographer of the Cold Warrior diplomat strategist, George F. Kennan. A critic
of the strategy of Soviet containment devised by Kennan, he also established
himself as the major opponent of the 1960s left “revisionist historians” led by
William Appleman Williams and the “Wisconsin
School,” which exposed US imperial
designs and culpability in inaugurating and perpetuating the East-West
conflict. A helmsman of the
“post-revisionist” conservative turn, Gaddis became one of the first US
diplomatic historians to plumb Soviet-era archives. He has written numbers of
articles regarding the need for a post-Cold War American grand strategy. His
expertise has been sought by the CIA and the Naval
War College.
In 2005, at the height of the Iraq War, President Bush awarded him the National Humanities Medal. [Mark Alden Branch , “Days of Duck and Cover,”
Yale Alumni Magazine, (March, 2000); http://www.yalealumnimagazine.com/issues/00_03/gaddis.html;
[5] The second member of the “Triumvirate” is the endowed chair in history, Paul Kennedy. Described as the “liberal” of the trio, Kennedy is perhaps best described as a “liberal hawk”. He edited a 1991 collection entitled Grand Strategies in War and Peace. He not only directed the ISS center but is now a “distinguished fellow” with the Brady-Johnson Program in Grand Strategy. He has authored some nineteen books, including such titles as The War Plans of the Great Powers, The Realities Behind Diplomacy, and Preparing for the Twenty-First Century and the highly successful The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (1988). [“Paul Kennedy,” http://www.yale.edu/history/faculty/kennedy.html; http://www.yale.edu/history/faculty/documents/Kennedy-Apr08.pdf ].
While regularly described as the “moderate” or even the “left” of the Yale GSP trio, Kennedy signed on to several letters to the president issued by the neoconservative-led Project for a New American Century (PNAC). Kennedy signed PNAC’s “Open Letter to Congress on Increasing U.S. Ground Forces” in January, 2005 . Arguing that, “The United States will not and should not become less engaged in the world in the years to come,” and that the U.S. military engagement in the Middle East would take a "generational commitment," the signatories called upon the legislative branch “to take the steps necessary to increase substantially the size of the active duty Army and Marine Corps” by at least 25,000 troops annually over the next several years. [PNAC, Letter to Congress on Increasing US Ground Forces (January, 28, 2005), http://www.newamericancentury.org/defense-20050128.htm; Tom Barry, “Neocons and Liberals Together, Again” (February 02, 2005) http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/articles/display/Neocons_and_Liberals_Together_Again.]
[6] Perhaps the
most interesting of the Grand Strategy Bulldogs is Charles “Charlie” Hill, the trio’s unabashed “man of the right”. Currently a
“diplomat in residency” and lecturer in international studies, as well as
another “Brady-Johnson Distinguished Fellow in Grand Strategy,” he came to the
academy following a previous career and forced retirement from the diplomatic
corps. Critics have dubbed him Yale’s “diplomat-in-exile”. A foreign service
careerist, in 1983 he became Secretary of State George Schultz’s Chief of Staff
and that ultimately led to his “career change”. He was forced to resign when
the investigation of the Reagan-era “Iran-Contra Affair” revealed he had
concealed and falsified evidence of Schultz’s extensive insider knowledge of
illegal goings-on from federal agents. An investigation concluded that Hill had
willfully withheld relevant notes and prepared false testimony for his boss in
1987. An unindicted co-conspirator, he eventually made his way to Yale in 1997.
A
reviewer of his 2007 biography found Hill to be one whose worldview is based on
a 'fundamental faith in the righteousness of American power, properly wielded'
and a man who looks back fondly at the methods and success of Reagan foreign policies. He served
during Vietnam, from 1971-73, as the “mission coordinator” at the
U.S Embassy in Saigon. In the mid to late 1970s, he was a member of the
policy planning staff and speech writer for then Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger.
He then
went on to occupy several positions at the US embassy at Tel Aviv before being
elevated to the State Department’s Director of Israel and Arab-Israeli Affairs
in 1981 and Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Middle East in 1982. He
established close ties with the right wing Likud Party during that period.
Like his colleague Kennedy, Hill also was a signer of
several statements and letters issued by the Project for a New American Century
(PNAC), that key promoter for the reassertion of an aggressive post-Cold War
globalism and the invasion of Iraq. While already at Yale, Hill served as chief foreign
policy advisor and chair of Rudolph Giuliani’s senior advisory team during the
New York Mayor’s short-lived bid for the 2008 Republican Party Presidential
nomination. In that position, he rubbed elbows with various notables of the
neoconservative movement including the Washington Institute for Near East
Policy’s Martin Kramer, Peter Berkowitz of the Hoover Institute, Commentary
magazine’s Norman Podhoretz, and the likes of Daniel Pipes, noted for his
campaigns against American “Islamofascist” college professors. [“Charles Hill”
http://www.hoover.org/fellows/10191; “Who is Charlie Hill?” http://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.com/2007/10/who-is-charles-hill.html]
Interviewed for a Yale Daily News article on reasons
for the high number of Yalies historically and more recently recruited by the
CIA, Hill offered an explanation. "People who go to Yale are people of
high character," he said. "In intelligence agencies, you need people
with character; they've got to be intrepid, you have to know that they're going
to do the job." The reporter apparently did not follow up with a question
regarding Hill’s behavior during the Iran-Contra going-on nor did he mention
that Hill did his undergrad at Brown and M.A. at Penn. [Julie Post, “For God, Country, Yale and the CIA,”
Yale Daily News September 24, 2004, (http://www.yaledailynews.com/news/2004/sep/24/for-god-country-yale-and-the-cia/)
]
[7] Among
those in on the early discussions was the New York Times’ Thomas Friedman.
Bruce Fellman “Training the Next Leaders” Yale Alumni Magazine March,
2003 http://www.yalealumnimagazine.com/issues/03_03/grandstrategy.html.
[8].
Ibid.; Gaddis, “What is Grand Strategy,” Duke University, February 26, 2009,
the keynote address for a conference on “American Grand Strategy after War,”
sponsored by the Triangle Institute for Security Studies and the Duke
University Program in American Grand Strategy, pp.8. http://www.duke.edu/web/agsp/grandstrategypaper.pdf
[9]
Career diplomat John Negroponte (Yale, Class of
1960) became Deputy Secretary of State, second-in-command to Condoleeza Rice in the State Department, starting in February,
2007. Just prior, he was appointed by George W. Bush as the first Director of
National Intelligence. He also served as a Bush era US representative to the
United Nations. He played a central role in the push for UN Security Council
backing for the eventual U.S-led invasion of Iraq and Bush appointed him as ambassador to Baghdad in June, 2004. Earlier in his career, from 1971 to
1973, he was the officer-in-charge for Viernam
at the National Security Council (NSC), yet
another acolyte of Henry Kissinger.
Negroponte won notoriety as Ronald Reagan’s ambassador to Honduras during the 1980s “Contra War” against Nicaragua and the Honduran military dictatorship of General Gustavo Alvarez MartÃnez. During that time, Honduras was ruled by a US-backed military regime accused of human rights violations and death squad activity. US military aid to Honduras during the period grew from $4,000,000 to over $77,000,000. Honduras was also used as a staging area for the Nicaraguan Contra insurgents illegally aided by the Reagan Administration in violation of congressional mandate. The Honduran Rights Commission, which documented the disappearance and torture of over 184 political opponents of that country’s military regime, accused Negroponte of complicity in numerous human rights violations.
The later publication of U.S. Embassy cables from Tegucigalpa written between late 1981 and 1984 exposed dozens of communiqués in which the Ambassador sought to undermine regional peace efforts, as well as multiple reports of meetings and conversations with Honduran military officers instrumental in providing logistical support and infrastructure for CIA covert operations in support of the “Contra War” -"our special project" as Negroponte referred to it in the cable traffic.
Among the records were special “back channel” communications with then-CIA director William Casey, including a recommendation to increase the number of arms being supplied to the leading contra force, and advice on how to rewrite a Presidential finding on covert operations to overthrow the Sandinistas to make it more politically palatable to an increasingly uneasy U.S. Congress. Conspicuously absent from the cable traffic were reports on human rights atrocities committed by the Honduran military and its secret police units under the military leadership of General Gustavo Alvarez, Negroponte's main liaison with the Honduran government. For details on Negroponte’s career, see: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB151/index.htm; http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_D._Negroponte; http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB151/index.htm; http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_D._Negroponte.
Negroponte won notoriety as Ronald Reagan’s ambassador to Honduras during the 1980s “Contra War” against Nicaragua and the Honduran military dictatorship of General Gustavo Alvarez MartÃnez. During that time, Honduras was ruled by a US-backed military regime accused of human rights violations and death squad activity. US military aid to Honduras during the period grew from $4,000,000 to over $77,000,000. Honduras was also used as a staging area for the Nicaraguan Contra insurgents illegally aided by the Reagan Administration in violation of congressional mandate. The Honduran Rights Commission, which documented the disappearance and torture of over 184 political opponents of that country’s military regime, accused Negroponte of complicity in numerous human rights violations.
The later publication of U.S. Embassy cables from Tegucigalpa written between late 1981 and 1984 exposed dozens of communiqués in which the Ambassador sought to undermine regional peace efforts, as well as multiple reports of meetings and conversations with Honduran military officers instrumental in providing logistical support and infrastructure for CIA covert operations in support of the “Contra War” -"our special project" as Negroponte referred to it in the cable traffic.
Among the records were special “back channel” communications with then-CIA director William Casey, including a recommendation to increase the number of arms being supplied to the leading contra force, and advice on how to rewrite a Presidential finding on covert operations to overthrow the Sandinistas to make it more politically palatable to an increasingly uneasy U.S. Congress. Conspicuously absent from the cable traffic were reports on human rights atrocities committed by the Honduran military and its secret police units under the military leadership of General Gustavo Alvarez, Negroponte's main liaison with the Honduran government. For details on Negroponte’s career, see: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB151/index.htm; http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_D._Negroponte; http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB151/index.htm; http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_D._Negroponte.
[10] “Negroponte '60 to join Grand Strategy program”
Yale Daily News, Wednesday, January 21, 2009 http://www.yaledailynews.com/news/2009/jan/21/negroponte-60-to-join-grand-strategy-program/;
http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local/Yale-Snags-Another-Diplomat-.html.
[11] John J. Miller, “Clash of Cultures - How
donors can increase understanding of the Middle East,”
Philosophy Roundtable, August 6, 2007.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122973925559323583.html#articleTabs%3Darticle
); http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Nwhz1Rk9aNgJ:www.philanthropyroundtable.org/article.asp%3Farticle%3D1487%26paper%3D1%26cat%3D147+charles+johnson+roger+hertog&hl=en&client=firefox-a&gl=us&strip=1
[12] Nicholas F. Brady: http://www.darbyoverseas.com/darby/jsp/bios/n_brady.jsp.
For MITRE, see: http://wapedia.mobi/en/MITRE_Corporation; The
University of Wisconsin JASONs, ostensibly name after, but not directly
connected to the national organization, was instrumental in the creation of
Wisconsin’s Grand Strategy Program.
[14] For a recent syllabus from a Yale GSP seminar, see: http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:M7qg3x6Qcm8J:iss.yale.edu/node/40/attachment+minh+a.+luong+yale&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESg6lrPq09zeFVtJ7GWQuEOBxJyqGmL7DWtCWXT5nKFiXx1cShn3nZ_IPbbO0xf4NbSmLF-dzT_qtIoa27Cwk6soVWqIdgJ7t6e0q3sFwyImRFP9DdhZycRfbBBjjP3gtRQSWAm8&sig=AHIEtbS7-7xXt0grlMN7UsIdAr8_o8Cytg.
[15] For a description of the Yale program and its
origins, see: John Gaddis, “What Is
Grand Strategy?”, http://www.duke.edu/web/agsp/grandstrategypaper.pdf
.
[16] At one such session, Gaddis played President
George W. Bush. Wearing cowboy boots, he propped his feet up on a desk and
walked out of the room in the middle of a presentation. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122973925559323583.html
[17] Bolton at Yale :
http://www.marines.mil/unit/hqmc/Pages/MarinesvisitYale.aspx.
[18] William Alden “There is No Fighting in the
War Room,” Yale Daily News (December
7, 2007) http://www.yaledailynews.com/news/2007/dec/07/there-is-to-be-no-fighting-in-the-war-room/
.
[19]
“Where Policy Makers Are Born,” http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122973925559323583.html.
[20]
Maj. Juliet Chelkowski, “Marines discuss the future security environment
with Yale University representatives” Leatherneck, 3/2/2009 [http://www.leatherneck.com/forums/showthread.php?t=80019.]
[21]
Yale International Historians
in the World http://internationalhistory.yale.edu/yale-international-historians-world.
[22] Jeff Nadaner: http://www.almevents.com/admin/apps/Person/PersonView.cfm?person_id=38955; http://www.spoke.com/profiles/m5gxxlv; http://www.yale.edu/history/gradstudents/dissertations/may-2002.html; http://www.pressoffice.cornell.edu/releases/release.cfm?r=16459&y=2006&m=3. For Lockheed Martin, http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=d000000104.
[30] Amy Dockser Marcus, “Where Policy Makers Are Born - A class at Yale with close Washington ties aims to expand to other schools ” Wall Street Journal, (December 20, 2008). http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122973925559323583.html#articleTabs%3Darticle
[34] On Hertog grant to Temple, see: http://www.temple.edu/cenfad/strategic-visions/documents/HertogSeminarinGrandStrategy.pdf
[47] Judith Miller, “Summer School on World Threats,” Minding Our Campuses, Reforming Our Universities (November 5, 2010). http://www.mindingthecampus.com/originals/2010/11/summer_school_on_world_threats.html.
[51] “Phillip Bobbit: Philip Bobbitt:
The presidents' brain” London Independent (July 20, 2008) ( http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/philip-bobbitt-the-presidents-brain-872412.html;
also:http://www.hoover.org/fellows/9211;
http://www.law.columbia.edu/fac/Philip_Bobbitt; http://www.tikvahlaw.org/faculty/philip-c-bobbitt/.
[23]
More recently, Hertog made a rare appearance in the news when he put up a
$2,000,000 dollar unsecured bond for his close associate Black, after the
Canadian media mogul won an appeal on a technicality. He was convicted of three
counts of fraud and one count of obstruction of justice in a scheme that that
diverted $6.1 million for personal use from a publishing venture , Hollinger
International that he controlled. He was acquitted of nine other counts,
including racketeering. Black was sentenced to six-and-a-half years, of which
he served slightly more than two years when Hertog got him out on July 19, 2010, pending further
proceedings. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conrad_Black; http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/838244; http://www.canada.com/news/Lord+Black+financial+saviour+Roger+Hertog/3305715/story.html
[24] For Hertog’s connections with neo-conservative movement, and a detailed account of the rise and seeting of the New York Sun, see: Scott Sherman, “Sun-rise in New York” The Nation, April 18, 2007. http://www.thenation.com/print/article/sun-rise-new-york., and Joe Hagan, “President Bush’s Neoconservatives Were Spawned Right Here in N.Y.C.” New York Observer, April 27, 2003. http://www.observer.com/2003/04/president-bushs-neoconservatives-were-spawned-right-here-in-nyc-new-home-of-the-rightwing-gloat/. Michael Tomasky “Who Is Roger Hertog?” American Prospect, May 5, 2005 http://prospect.org/cs/articles?article=who_is_roger_hertog; “Roger Hertog” http://wapedia.mobi/en/Roger_Hertog.
[25] While Hertog was not as fabulously wealthy as some of his conservative associates, he also became the executor for the estate of his mentor and business associate, Zalman Bernstein. (http://www.nytimes.com/1999/01/09/business/zalman-c-bernstein-72-iconoclastic-broker.html; http://tikvahfund.org/about/page/our-founder-zalman-c-bernstein ). Hertog has been able to draw from that fortune to dispense funds to numerous conservative ventures in Israel and the US, primarily through the Tikvah Fund, founded by Bernstein and now headed by his disciple. For some sense of where Tikavh Fund money has gone under Hertog’s leadership, see: http://tikvahfund.org/current_projects/.
One study of Israeli think
tanks described the Shalem Center,
of which Hertog was an important backer, in the following manner: “The Shalem
Center is unique on the Israeli
think tank scene. First it explicitly promotes a neo-conservative right-wing
world view. Second, its declared aim is to help formulate a neo-conservative
ideology which is adapted to Israeli society and the Jewish world at large.
Thirdly, it clearly sees itself as laying the foundation of a new form of
political and social thinking, which will ultimately change Israeli
society.” Sarit Ben Simhon-Peleg, Jewish
Philanthropy and the Third Sector – The Case of Israeli Think Tanks. (Tel Aviv:
2008) http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:ro5Cm_QFyRYJ:spirit.tau.ac.il/government/downloads/Sarit_Bensimhon-Peleg_Bl_jphil.pdf+Jewish+Philanthropy+and+the+Israeli+Third+Sector&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESiuoZ5OPYmcNZDLRXq_q5OujkyZ5ivvd5UqfhdSILDeLN_Ee6ZbvSFWm09nhDbLNS8zXGr-b8D77CdkxxtTXY_0he-QQYOC-I_wO8BOxAr-PqukdTHK3gvll8fjlDW16Ls4eo8m&sig=AHIEtbRxf0sJsjhLe24SoGtUk3sUhhAzOg. For Hertog’s ties to various Israeli
ventures, see: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:kjtK6WEL09QJ:www.philanthropyroundtable.org/article.asp%3Farticle%3D1645+Hertog+Shalem+Center&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a&source=www.google.com; http://israel-lightontonations.blogspot.com/2011/05/shalem-center-gets-major-grant-for.html; http://www.shalem.org.il/;
[26]
Campus journals receiving Hertog money include those at Columbia,
Toronto, Brandeis, NYU, Michigan,
Pennsylvania, Princeton
and Yale. Hertog money also went into the Shalem
Center’s journal, Azure, a
quarterly “on issue concerning the Jewish public” to which Jeremi Suri has contributed. “Student
Activism Moves from Rallies to Journals. Israeli Thin Tank Funding North
American Campus Publications”. (http://www.columbia.edu/cu/current/press1.html.)
Hertog also became an important contributor, along with a number of other
multi-millionaire conservatives to the Birthright Israel Foundation, which by
October, 2010 had sent more than 260,000 young Jewish Americans on all expense
paid 10-day trips to Israel.
Kiera Feldman, “Operation Birthright,” The Nation, (June 16, 2011); http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:kjtK6WEL09QJ:www.philanthropyroundtable.org/article.asp%3Farticle%3D1645+Birthright+Hertog&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a&source=www.google.com..
[27]
The Hertog Foundation underwrote the costs of the September 20, 2011. For Hertog’s and Walker’s
full remarks, see: http://www.publicsectorinc.org/events/CSLL092011.html
[28]
Brett Stephens, “The Business of Big Ideas - Meet Roger Hertog,” Philanthropy, (October 1, 2010), http://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/article.asp?article=1645.
[29] Elizabeth Harris, “The Policy Revolutionaries,” Worth Magazine, May 1, 2006, http://www.drummajorinstitute.org/library/article.php?ID=6480. http://intermexfreemarket.blogspot.com/2008/05/roger-hertog-free-markets-and-all-that.html; Naomi Schaefer Riley, “Roger Hertog: ‘Free Markets and All That Stuff,” Wall Street Journal, (May 17, 2008), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121097767831299847.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries. David Skinner, “Roger Hertog,” http://www.neh.gov/news/archive/2007_Medalists.html#Hertog.
[29] Elizabeth Harris, “The Policy Revolutionaries,” Worth Magazine, May 1, 2006, http://www.drummajorinstitute.org/library/article.php?ID=6480. http://intermexfreemarket.blogspot.com/2008/05/roger-hertog-free-markets-and-all-that.html; Naomi Schaefer Riley, “Roger Hertog: ‘Free Markets and All That Stuff,” Wall Street Journal, (May 17, 2008), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121097767831299847.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries. David Skinner, “Roger Hertog,” http://www.neh.gov/news/archive/2007_Medalists.html#Hertog.
Re: the Tikvah Fund, see: http://www.tikvahfund.org/ and http://www.nyutikvah.org/about/InterviewRogerHertog.htm. For a critical look at the operation of the Fund and a discussion of Hertog’s role, see: Zachary Braiterman, “Conservative Money and Jewish Studies: Investigating the Tikvah Fund,” http://ejewishphilanthropy.com/conservative-money-and-jewish-studies-investigating-the-tikvah-fund/
[31] Dockser
Marcus, “Where Policy Makers Are Born…” ibid..
[32]
In contrast to what had been the home page statement of purpose for the U-Wisconsin-Madison GSP, the
description and stated purpose of the Duke GSP is remarkably up-front. The Duke
home page opening paragraph, in its emtirety, reads: “American grand strategy is the collection
of plans and policies by which the leadership of the United
States mobilizes and deploys the country's
resources and capabilities, both military and non-military, to achieve its
national goals. Grand strategy exists in the real world of governing, whether
it is carefully formulated and articulated in advance, or whether it evolves ad
hoc out of the world-views, predilections, and subjectivities of those who
govern. It is a fruitful field for scholars and students to study so that those
who govern and those who are governed might have the richest conceptual
repertoire with which to construct and evaluate national policies. http://www.duke.edu/web/agsp/.
[33] “Philanthropist and UW-Madison join to develop new-generation leaders" http://jeremisuri.net/archives/472; Hertog Grants to UW: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:_4gzF_Oh35wJ:grants.philanthropy.com/pcgi-bin/premium/gtg/texis/premium/grants/gtgsearch/%2B4wwFqt5nwGqrxFqnGwDAqFqnGwDAmFqm5xznFqXhdGnotDCawhhwoG5Caw5owCanm1qwBodDCaGn5nwGqrCaomnDBoBOhFqwtFqwrzheE-wwweS-wwwozme%2BqwwwAzmSwwwcFqzPWWX9vKe2VmmFqw3zmwwww+Hertog+Foundation+wisconsin&cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a&source=www.google.com.
[34] On Hertog grant to Temple, see: http://www.temple.edu/cenfad/strategic-visions/documents/HertogSeminarinGrandStrategy.pdf
[35] On Gerson, see: Naomi Schaefer Riley "Mr. Compassionate Conservatism," The Wall Street Journal (October 21,2006) http://www.freedomworks.org/news/mr-compassionate-conservatism; Michael Isikoff & David Corn, Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War. Gerson was also Chief Speechwriter and Senior Policy Adviser during Bush’s Presidential campaign (1999–2000) [ http://www.blindspotreligion.com/contributors.html ], was a foreign policy advisor at the Heritage Foundation, and currently is a columnist for the Washington Post.
[36] Accrording to one report, Feaver approached Hertog as early as the fall, 2007 with a bid for a grant to inaugurate the GSP at Duke. (“Where Policy Makers Are Born - A class at Yale with close Washington ties aims to expand to other schools ” Wall Street Journal, December 20, 2008.) http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122973925559323583.html#articleTabs%3Darticle. According to his personal vita, he received two grants from the Hertog Foundation for the Duke progam -- $73,000 in 2008 and $75,000 in 2009, apparently utilized for the hiring of a “Hertog Assistant/Associate Professorship in American Military/Diplomatic History”[https://fds.duke.edu/db/aas/PoliticalScience/faculty/pfeaver/files/CV.pdf; https://h-net.org/jobs/job_display.php?id=39085 ] Feaver’s vita sites a much longer list of diverse donors to his various projects, among them notable conservative foundations like the Milwaukee-based Bradley Foundation and the Smith Richardson Foundation.
[36] Accrording to one report, Feaver approached Hertog as early as the fall, 2007 with a bid for a grant to inaugurate the GSP at Duke. (“Where Policy Makers Are Born - A class at Yale with close Washington ties aims to expand to other schools ” Wall Street Journal, December 20, 2008.) http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122973925559323583.html#articleTabs%3Darticle. According to his personal vita, he received two grants from the Hertog Foundation for the Duke progam -- $73,000 in 2008 and $75,000 in 2009, apparently utilized for the hiring of a “Hertog Assistant/Associate Professorship in American Military/Diplomatic History”[https://fds.duke.edu/db/aas/PoliticalScience/faculty/pfeaver/files/CV.pdf; https://h-net.org/jobs/job_display.php?id=39085 ] Feaver’s vita sites a much longer list of diverse donors to his various projects, among them notable conservative foundations like the Milwaukee-based Bradley Foundation and the Smith Richardson Foundation.
[39] Nagl in
some ways is the epitome of the increasingly influential public warrior
intellectual. The President of the Center for a New American Security, he
is also a member of the Defense Policy Board, a Visiting Professor in the War
Studies Department at Kings College of London, a life member of the Council on
Foreign Relations, and a member of London’s International Institute of
Strategic Studies.
He led a tank platoon in
Operation Desert Storm and served as the operations officer of a tank battalion
task force in Operation Iraqi Freedom before going on to teach national
security studies at West Point and at Georgetown’s Security Studies Program. He
has served as a Military Assistant to two Deputy Secretaries of Defense.
He earned his Master of the
Military Arts and Sciences Degree from the U.S. Army Command and General
Staff College
and his doctorate from Oxford University
as a Rhodes Scholar. The author of the widely-read Learning to Eat Soup
with a Knife: Counterinsurgency Lessons from Malaya and Vietnam, he has published widely in the mainstream and
military/national security press, spoken on TV and radio and lectured
domestically and internationally at various war colleges, major universities, intelligence
agencies, and business forums. [http://www.cnas.org/nagl
].
[40] For Gates at Duke, also see: “Gates Praises Service, Sacrifice of All-Volunteer Force” http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=61068.
[41]
For a listing of guests of the Duke GSP, see: http://www.duke.edu/web/agsp/events/events.htm.
[42] “Hitchcock Brings Hertog Seminar in Grand Strategy to CENFAD,” Strategic
Visions, (Spring 2009) http://www.temple.edu/cenfad/strategic-visions/documents/HertogSeminarinGrandStrategy.pdf.
[43] FPRI Annual Report, 2009: http://www.fpri.org/about/FPRIAnnualReport.pdf.
[44] About
FPRI: http://www.fpri.org/about/
[45] For Connelly, see: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/history/fac-bios/Connelly/faculty.html. His first book, A Diplomatic Revolution: Algeria’s Fight for Independence and the Origins of the Post-Cold War Era, described “how rebels can harness their cause to global trends to isolate and defeat an empire.” He then switched gears to write Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population, a controversial conservative look at world-wide “family planning” attempts. http://www.matthewconnelly.net/index.html; http://www.matthewconnelly.net/ADR_page.html. For a critical review of Fatal Misconception, see: Steven Sinding, “Telling one side of a story” http://www.thefreelibrary.com/_/print/PrintArticle.aspx?id=227279159
[46] "Hertog Global Strategy Initiative," http://globalstrategy.columbia.edu/about/
[47] Judith Miller, “Summer School on World Threats,” Minding Our Campuses, Reforming Our Universities (November 5, 2010). http://www.mindingthecampus.com/originals/2010/11/summer_school_on_world_threats.html.
[48] “Students Participate in Scenario-Buiding
Exercise Led by Betty Sue Flowers” http://globalstrategy.columbia.edu/august-11-2010-students-participate-in-a-scenario-building-exercise-led-by-betty-sue-flowers/.
[49] Inboden: http://www.utexas.edu/news/2010/05/13/strauss_inboden/ ; http://books.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/04/10/the_top_ten_books_on_grand_strategy.
For background on Legatum, see: http://www.li.com/AboutUs.aspx; http://www.legatum.com/; http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2007-10-09/news/27690734_1_intellecap-christopher-chandler-share-microfin.
For background on Legatum, see: http://www.li.com/AboutUs.aspx; http://www.legatum.com/; http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2007-10-09/news/27690734_1_intellecap-christopher-chandler-share-microfin.
The Institute hosts occasional symposiums such as the “2009 Legatum Prosperity Symposium,” that have included numbers of the notable Long War academics and other elite Anglo-American globalists. Among those in attendance in 2009 were Duke grand strategist Peter Feaver; Inboden, still with Legatum at the time; Yale’s Paul Kennedy; former Yale International Strategic Studies associate Walter Russell Mead, and Jeremi Suri, still at Wisconsin. http://www.li.com/Participants2009.aspx and http://www.li.com/Panels2009.aspx .
[50] Bobbi Ray Inman: http://www.utexas.edu/lbj/directory/faculty/bobby-inman; http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bobby_Ray_Inman; “Former Blackwater Security Firm Gets New Leaders in Image Makeover,” http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/03/09/blackwater-security-firm-gets-new-leaders-image-makeover/.
[51] “Phillip Bobbit: Philip Bobbitt:
The presidents' brain” London Independent (July 20, 2008) ( http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/philip-bobbitt-the-presidents-brain-872412.html;
also:http://www.hoover.org/fellows/9211;
http://www.law.columbia.edu/fac/Philip_Bobbitt; http://www.tikvahlaw.org/faculty/philip-c-bobbitt/.
[52]
“Biographies of Participants, Triangle Institute
for Security Studies, American Grand
Strategy after War Durham and Chapel Hill, NC 26-28th February, 2009”
(Download available via “Speakers” link at: http://www.sanford.duke.edu/centers/tiss/DebatingGrandStrategyDetails.php)
[53] “Strategy and Policy Department Hosts Workshop on the Teaching of Grand Strategy” http://www.nwc.navy.mil/About/News/August-2010/Strategy-and-Policy-Department-Hosts-Workshop-on-t.aspx; “A Teaching Workshop” http://sarantakes.blogspot.com/2010/11/blog-lviii-teaching-workshop.html.
[54] Gaddis, “What is Grand Strategy” http://www.duke.edu/web/agsp/grandstrategypaper.pdf
[55] On Suri participation, see: “Workshop on the Teaching of Grand Strategy” (E-mail from John H..Maurer to Jeremi Suri, Friday, March 5th, 2010; (Reply), Suri to Maurer, March 8th, 2010. (Photocopies acquired through Wisconsin Open Records request. In possession of authors.) For Maurer, clearly an intimate of the relatively close knit circle of grand strategy academics, see: “John H. Maurer” http://www.ysmenwestportweston.org/Pages/Speakers/101007%20maurer.htm
[56] For Betts, See: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Richard_K._Betts; http://www.sipa.columbia.edu/academics/directory/rkb4-fac.html; http://www.cfr.org/experts/terrorism-intelligence-conflict-assessment/richard-k-betts/b5.
[55] On Suri participation, see: “Workshop on the Teaching of Grand Strategy” (E-mail from John H..Maurer to Jeremi Suri, Friday, March 5th, 2010; (Reply), Suri to Maurer, March 8th, 2010. (Photocopies acquired through Wisconsin Open Records request. In possession of authors.) For Maurer, clearly an intimate of the relatively close knit circle of grand strategy academics, see: “John H. Maurer” http://www.ysmenwestportweston.org/Pages/Speakers/101007%20maurer.htm
[56] For Betts, See: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Richard_K._Betts; http://www.sipa.columbia.edu/academics/directory/rkb4-fac.html; http://www.cfr.org/experts/terrorism-intelligence-conflict-assessment/richard-k-betts/b5.
[57] Michael Doran:
http://wagner.nyu.edu/doran; http://www.brookings.edu/experts/doranm.aspx?p=1
.
[58] A
graduate of West Point, Mansoor did his PhD at Ohio
State on how Army infantry
divisions were developed during World War II. For Mansoor, an expert in counterinsurgency at Ohio’s Mershon Center for
International Strategic Studies, see: http://mershoncenter.osu.edu/people/faculty/facultybios/mansoor.htm;
and “Winning in Afghanistan, ” Los Angeles Times, December 16, 2010.[ http://articles.latimes.com/2010/dec/16/opinion/la-oe-mansoorandboot-afghanistanrepor20101216].
[59 ] http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/Friedberg.
Aaron Freidberg has also been a consultant with various the Department of
Defense, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Council, and
the Los Alamos National Laboratory. http://www.princeton.edu/ciss/people/display_person.xml?netid=alf&display=All;
[60] On Lieber: http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/Lieber_Robert_J; http://cirs.georgetown.edu/105272.html
. See also his 2007 piece on “academic freedom” in regard to the left academy
and particularly Middle East Studies: SIFTING AND WINNOWING: THE USES AND
ABUSES OF ACADEMIC FREEDOM, International Studies Perspectives (2007) 8,
410-417, October 9, 2007. http://spme.net/cgi-bin/articles.cgi?ID=3003
. For the Committee on the Present Danger (CPD), http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/Committee_on_the_Present_Danger
.
[61]
Additional participants included: Reagan hagiographer Kiron Skinner, director
of Carnegie Mellon’s Center for International Relations and Politics and research
fellow at the Hoover Institute. : (http://www.hoover.org/fellows/9774/short-bio;
http://sds.hss.cmu.edu/src/faculty/skinner.php)
Richard Schultz and Bill Martel from
Tufts University’s International Security Studies Program (http://fletcher.tufts.edu/issp/shultz.shtml;
http://fletcher.tufts.edu/issp/martel.shtml);
Eric Adler, specialist on Roman imperialism from Connecticut College (http://www.conncoll.edu/academics/web_profiles/adler.html); U-Penn’s neocon China policy “hawk,,” Arthur
Waldron (http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/Waldron_Arthur)
; Steven Rosen, Harvard Professor of National Security and Military Affairs and
former faculty member at the NWC,
director of political-military affairs at the National Security Council
in the Ronald Reagan White House. (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Stephen_Peter_Rosen).
Boston University’s
Erik Goldstein, (http://www.bu.edu/ir/faculty/alphabetical/goldstein/
) and Pinceton’s G. John Ikenberry (http://www.princeton.edu/~gji3/.)
filled out the list.
[62] “Naval War College Workshop on the Teaching of Grand Strategy… (4-6 August 2010) – Workshop Schedule” (Photocopy of attachment to e-mail, originally sent to Jeremi Suri from John H. Maurer, 20 July 2010. Acquired through Wisconsin Open Records request. In possession of authors.); [Naval War College] “Strategy and Policy Department Hosts Workshop on the Teaching of Grand Strategy” http://www.usnwc.edu/About/News-And-Events/August-2010/Strategy-and-Policy-Department-Hosts-Workshop-on-t.aspx
[63] (E-mail: “Teaching Grand Strategy Workshop” Friday, August 6, 2010 From: John H. Maurer [Chair, Strategy and Policy Department, Naval War College] To: [Recipients] (Photocopy. Acquired through Open Records Request, Jeremi Suri, the University of Wisconsin. In possession of authors.)
According
to his bio page on the Hudson website, Libby “guides the Institute's program on
national security and defense issues, devoting particular attention to U.S. national security strategy, strategic planning, the
future of Asia, the Middle
East, and the war against
Islamic radicalism.” The page failed to mention his conviction on charges of
lying to government investigators.
A
founding signatory of the Project for a New American Century, Libby was a
member of the clique of hardliners and neoconservatives who pushed for the Iraq
War. He was convicted in March 2007 on charges of lying to government
investigators probing the leak of the identity of CIA agent Valerie Plame.
Among the charges were two counts of perjury, one count of making false
statements, and one of obstruction of justice.
The
Hudson Institute belongs to a closely knit group of neoconservative policy
institutes that promote an Israel-centric hawkish Middle East foreign policy.The
Institute’s associates also do research on domestic social and economic
agendas, claiming to "challenge conventional thinking and help manage
strategic transitions to the future through interdisciplinary and collaborative
studies in defense, international relations, economics, culture, science,
technology, and law.” (On Libby and Hudson Institute: http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/Libby_I_Lewis_Scooter;
http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/Hudson_Institute#_ednref2
)
[64] In addition to the universities central to the story
here, others encountered along the way but hardly mentioned if at all, have
included the obvious members of the varsity team, such as Harvard, MIT,
Stanford, Johns Hopkins, Dartmouth,
Princeton and NYU. Programs such as the University of Georgia
Grand Strategy Working Group ("Georgia Grand Strategy" or "the
Group") (http://pearhead.myweb.uga.edu/ggsindex.html),
founded in January 2009, and the Fletcher School’s International Security
Studies Program at Tufts University with its “Marine Generals Events” and its
exclusive lecture series (http://fletcher.tufts.edu/ISSP/Events)
came briefly into view. The Mershon Center for International Security Studies at Ohio State (http://mershoncenter.osu.edu/about/landing_about.htm)
and the Miller Center at the University of Virginia (http://millercenter.org/policy)
certainly warranted a closer look as do the ties of the various military war
colleges to the rest. (For example, the Strategic Studies Institute at the US
Army War College, (http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/)
; the Grand Strategy Program at the US
Air War College, (http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/departments/strategy.htm);
the National Defense University, (http://www.ndu.edu/info/about_ndu.cfm)
and the US Air Force Air University (http://www.au.af.mil/au/facts.asp).
The goings-on at such places as the University of Central Florida, with its large scale military-related institutes,
research funding and “public-private partnership” with defense contractors
certainly merited a closer look. (http://www.centralfloridafuture.com/2.10660/military-research-funding-controversial-1.1422322;
“Northrop Grumman and University of Central Florida Partner for
Military Physiological Study,” http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Northrop_Grumman_and_University_of_Central_Florida_Partner_for_Military_Physiological_Study_999.html)